Case Study: Powerlink and Distributional Fairness

Distributional Fairness

Learning from others on how to compensate Landholders

Distributional Fairness is about making sure that the benefits and impacts of development activities are distributed fairly among different groups of people. To achieve this, we need to think about how decisions are made regarding the distribution of these benefits and impacts.

This may involve developing and clearly communicating the criteria used to assign benefits and approaches to mitigating impacts on those most affected by development activity. When designing these decision-making processes, it's important to take into account the perspectives and priorities of the communities involved.

Powerlink Queensland

In Voconiq research for Powerlink in Southern Queensland where intensive renewable transmission and generation infrastructure is planned, modelling of Voconiq data showed that opportunities for landholders to be compensated for direct impact from transmission infrastructure was an important driver of trust for community members, but not landholders themselves

 

This modelling showed that community members were watching how Powerlink treated this most vulnerable group, and their level of trust in the organisation was, in part, dependent on the fair treatment of others. When we think about what trust is – being vulnerable with another and knowing they will not take advantage of that vulnerability – the importance is clear. Community members were taking cues from how landholders were treated to understand more clearly the values and approach that Powerlink takes to external stakeholders in general. It is also likely that community members were using these observations to inform their views on how they are likely to be treated by Powerlink should they be impacted directly in the future.

While counterintuitive at first, this finding has had significant impact on how Powerlink thinks about and implements landholder negotiation and compensation processes.

Powerlink has worked hard to refine and reveal a lot more about how negotiations with landholders typically take place to anyone that is interested (while being very careful not to reveal anything about specific negotiations or terms). They have also worked to refine their compensation frameworks considering this and other findings (i.e. distributional fairness was also a strong driver of trust) to develop a more transparent and equitable way to ensure the most vulnerable and impacted stakeholders in their operational footprint are treated fairly.

 

Learn more about our work with Powerlink here

PQ_colour_logo_trans_smalllfile
en_USEnglish